Torsten 发表于 2010-4-22 20:45

纪念 Güllich

Hey!

Check out this new route:
纪念 Güllich, 5.11d

Thanks for any comments.

T

天空wk3368 发表于 2010-4-22 21:52

原来是你干的!

mh 发表于 2010-4-23 10:51

Why giving it this name? Was the route climbed on Guellich's birth day or death day?

nk 发表于 2010-4-23 13:12

看样子是运动攀?
真好,终于可以爬纪念碑了,呵呵

gump 发表于 2010-4-23 15:24

本帖最后由 gump 于 2010-4-23 07:42 编辑

This stone, is first route in white river,
We called monument.

Monument is light,
Guide people learning to freedom,
Monument is a dream,
One and only in white river,
Monument is a icon,
Original route is monument,
Monument is high ball...

We don't need any one more new route,
We don't need any one more bolt,
Blue and yellow totally is bull shit,
Please leave us a clean place.

This land is my land,
This land is your land.

灰灰 发表于 2010-4-23 21:01

更正一点:
纪念碑线路2(蓝色线路)的第一段,我最初开成传统运动混合攀,线路类型岩缝+FACE,去年秋天已改成全程运动攀,现在具有两种爬法:利用岩缝+face攀登难度约5,9+;全程face面攀登难度约5.11a 。

w2 发表于 2010-4-23 22:06

回复 5# gump
记得2000年爬的时候,还是传统1段,第2段好像还没有?

bince 发表于 2010-4-23 22:51

本帖最后由 bince 于 2010-4-23 16:37 编辑

早晚有一天,
纪念碑会被钉成刺猬碑,
幺妹峰也会被安上电梯,
珠峰更不用说,一定有缆车往来于顶峰上下,

也许这都是无法避免的事。

但愿这一天到来的时候
白河峡谷两侧已经有数万条线路
8千米峰顶会有5星级酒店
世上再没有未登峰可爬

在这一天到来之前
你丫挺的
能干点有创意的事吗?

jane 发表于 2010-4-23 23:28

本帖最后由 jane 于 2010-4-24 01:10 编辑

在甘叔原创的基础上恣意加钉加片, 呵呵:

This stone, has (the) first route
in white river,
We called (it) (the) Monument.

Monument is (the) light,
leading people to freedom,
Monument is a dream,
One and only in white river,
Monument is a(n) icon,
Original route is (the) Monument,
Monument is (a true) high ball...

We don't needmore new routes,
We don't need any more bolts,
Blue and yellow lines are totally crap,
Can't you leave us a clean place?

This land is my land,
This land is your land.
(Only good routes will stand
in the end.)

灰灰 发表于 2010-4-24 13:25

说实话: 我觉得第3条线路,有点儿画蛇添足了。已经有两条线(一条传统、一条运动)可以到达这条线的顶端(正上方),完全可以顶绳爬3号线,而且3号线的上半部分和1号线、2号线共用了手点和脚点,3号线有点儿纠结不清,不是很纯粹。在很久以前我设想过这条路线,也试过起步,但2号线开通之后,我决定不开这条线,因为线路太短了,部分与其他线重合,而且可以顶绳爬,对于纪念碑整体规划来说不协调。

没想到如今还是有人给开了!开3号线都有谁参与了?
这种做法和我在岩壁上凿点,以及挨着猫狗大战开新线有一曲同工之处,只不过施展的方式略有不同而已。看来大家都存在占有欲和创造欲的问题。谁先设想、先塑造、先实施、先发布,谁就获得了成就感,其他相关人就会有种失落感。有些人很难从失落感中走出来,而且会极力的反对实施者,因为他们的眼睛里只有失落,但我可以理解这种做法,至少是一种热爱,爱的方式不同而已,但我也希望大家能珍重,多想想、多跟大家交流交流,再决定干与不干。

mh 发表于 2010-4-24 16:21

我没明白照片里哪个是新路线。肯定不是1。

裂缝 发表于 2010-4-24 19:11

但我也希望大家能珍重,多想想、多跟大家交流交流,再决定干与不干。
灰灰 发表于 2010-4-24 05:25 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

灰灰的境界长了.

我也觉得有点多余了. 第一次爬纪念碑, 躺在第2段的平台上, 看见白鹳飞过, 太阳暖洋洋的. 很少有线爬出那种感觉. 当一个地方太容易到达, 这种感觉就更难找了.

w2 发表于 2010-4-25 08:26

回复 12# 裂缝
让我遥想起,将军峰顶的那根烟……
真纪念 Güllich,那就找个和 AD差不多的地形……

Torsten 发表于 2010-4-25 13:39

Bullshit is a hard word, brother.
I found this line when I repelled down from this wonderful line called 纪念碑. I fully respect the first ascender and the aesthetic of this line.
One of the ideas which Güllich and others developed back in the 70’s was the “Freeclimbing“ and “Redpoint“ ethics. In my eyes my new line fully respects these ethics of modern free climbing. It is an independent line and not overbolted.
I have climbed Line No. 2 and found somebody has chipped new hand holds to make this route work for himself, this is lame.

I fully respect the Chinese climbers and I am really sorry, that I hurt somebody’s feeling about this rock and that I didn’t listen to my friend Gump.

mh 发表于 2010-4-25 19:51

Time will tell if #3 is a worthy line.

Line 2 has chipped holds? Oh well.

裂缝 发表于 2010-4-25 20:09

Time will tell if #3 is a worthy line.

Line 2 has chipped holds? Oh well.
mh 发表于 2010-4-25 11:51 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

yeah, maybe somebody likes it. but chipped holds?a fly in soup, eh~~{:2_40:}

bince 发表于 2010-4-26 00:28

我很尊重你的开线行为。

但在一个有着无数空白岩壁和无数的的可能性的地区,让3条短短的路线如此紧凑甚至共用一个锚点无疑是懒惰和无聊的。

在这样的地区,如果你爬腻了已有的路线,花点时间去其它地方转转,看看,想想那些新鲜的石头会让你的攀登更加愉快,也会对其它攀岩者更有帮助。

我甚至不反感灰灰在一些偏远地带进行的凿手点行为,因为开拓的尝试远比什么“留个名”或“红个点”更加重要。

在任何时代,自由攀登的精髓都和想象力密不可分,

那些先驱也正是因为他们的想象力和勇气被我们记住的。

jane 发表于 2010-4-26 05:20

本帖最后由 jane 于 2010-4-25 21:37 编辑

Hey, Torsten,

I reckon the word "bullshit" is one of your favorite.You described the chipped hand holds as "bull shit".Why would you feel so sensitive when it is used to describe your route?When a person bolts a route, he enjoys the sense of accomplishment and like it or not, receives the judgment of the route from the public.

Here is a direct quote of your email to Xiaohe (小河):

“Torsten上周末爬了完美心情,给我写了如下邮件。

"...I climbed “完美心情 Perfect Feeling“ this weekend. I was absolutely shocked how badly people messed up the rock here. We found more that 30 artificial hand holds which somebody chipped into the rock. This is Bullshit! Who does this?...”

小鼻涕 发表于 2010-4-26 13:10

我很尊重你的开线行为。

但在一个有着无数空白岩壁和无数的的可能性的地区,让3条短短的路线如此紧凑甚至共用一个锚点无疑是懒惰和无聊的。

在这样的地区,如果你爬腻了已有的路线,花点时间去其它地方转转,看看,想想那些新鲜的石头会让你的攀登更加愉快,也会对其它攀岩者更有帮助。

我甚至不反感灰灰在一些偏远地带进行的凿手点行为,因为开拓的尝试远比什么“留个名”或“红个点”更加重要。

这种想法我不太同意 在世界所有的岩场 越是热门的岩场就越开发的多 公用一个顶链或公用几个挂片也不在少数 不能说因为可以从另一条线路上去安个顶绳可以爬周围的线路 那么我们就不开这些线路了 不同的线路有不同的风格 不同的动作 追求的并不是上去而是过程 在雷劈山还只是有5条线路的时候 可能现在很多的线都能用顶绳爬了 但是他还有开发的价值 他还可以开出那么多好玩儿的线 现在他有了几十条线 他还有开发的价值 他还可以打很多的延长线 我觉得北京攀岩的人很少是单纯的只为了“留个名”或“红个点” 不管是中国人还是老外
至于“我甚至不反感灰灰在一些偏远地带进行的凿手点行为,因为开拓的尝试远比什么“留个名”或“红个点”更加重要。”就更不能苟同了......我们什么时候对于石头也进行地域上的歧视了???难道因为偏远地带的石头没有城市户口我们就可以凿他???

nk 发表于 2010-4-26 14:45

没想到争论这么大,也许纪念碑对一些人意义非凡.
是否修了一条线共顶的话要征求前一为开线人的同意?不然我觉的这线很好.

bince 发表于 2010-4-26 16:11

回复 19# 小鼻涕

1 不反感不等于支持,我反对任何形式的凿点行为。

2 我从不认为爬顶绳算是攀岩,所以我并不是说有顶绳可爬就不需要开线了。

3 在一个有且只有3条线“热门岩场”,仅有的3条线还共用顶点.....也许是我孤陋寡闻,没听说哪里还有这样的(天然)岩场。

4 我支持和欣赏所有在石头上玩的行为,但“climbing”这个词里除了“难度,动作,风格”以外,还应该有一点儿“discovery”和“Explore”吧。

gump 发表于 2010-4-26 17:45

okey amigo, now this is a ugly stone near the dirty river in the worse country, who care?
but next time, if you want climbing the totem pole in monument valley, you better contact chief before...

Torsten 发表于 2010-4-26 18:12

How does this look to you?

gump 发表于 2010-4-26 18:43

perfect fucking feeling

天空wk3368 发表于 2010-4-26 21:39

当我右手放入那个凹槽的时候
真的是仰天长笑
角度是倾斜的,正好是lay的动作,而且边缘打磨过
灰灰真的很贴心 :)

jane 发表于 2010-4-27 07:58

本帖最后由 jane 于 2010-4-27 00:22 编辑

How does this look to you?
Torsten 发表于 2010-4-26 10:12 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif


    Not nearly as cool as this one I found online.Photo credit to an unnamed photographer.
Sincerely, chipped holds shall be viewed as art installation, inspired by Marina Abramovic, I expect a documentary movie completed with smeared blood, chapped lips, insect bites, rope burns, all very evident to the audience because of minimal clothing, -:).It satisfies one's desire to get high from experiencing or viewing dehydration, exhaustion, and self-mutilation.What is it about?Your route or his chipped hand holds, or the stone carvings on Tai Shan are all expressions.And it is essentially no different from a painting from Piccasso or a graffiti in a hood.   Don't take it too seriously, dude.   

http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/attachicons/image.gif

紫笛依扬 发表于 2010-4-27 09:33

本帖最后由 紫笛依扬 于 2010-4-27 07:53 编辑

我尊重每一位开线者,不管怎样,我们都是从5.9的水平成长起来的,如果"白河"可以更加OPEN,如果我们愿意更多的攀岩爱好者融入到这个群体,那么白河需要更多的运动攀线路。

至于传统攀,那可能也会是每个执着攀岩者的梦想,但是成长需要时间……

I respect everyone who mark the new route, in any case, we are all grown up from the 5.9 level, if Baihe can be more OPEN, if we want more climbing fans join into the group, then we needs more sport climbing routes.

As for trad climbing, it's the dream for every dedicated climbers, but we still need time to grown up...

mh 发表于 2010-4-27 11:08

Your route or his chipped hand holds, or the stone carvings on Tai Shan are all expressions.And it is essentially no different from a painting from Piccasso or a graffiti in a hood.
jane 发表于 2010-4-26 23:58 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

I hope you are joking. It's such a nonsense. Next you will say burning someone's house is also a form of acceptable expression.

The bottom line is that the NO CHIPPING ethic is a good one for the long term development of a climbing area. It has been proved again and again all over the world through out history. China is no exception.

Chipping is bad.Overcrowd route placing is also bad but not nearly as bad as chipping.

裂缝 发表于 2010-4-27 16:54

I hope you are joking. It's such a nonsense. Next you will say burning someone's house is also a f ...

Chipping is bad.Overcrowd route placing is also bad but not nearly as bad as chipping.
mh 发表于 2010-4-27 03:08 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

2nd that.

wei 发表于 2010-4-29 14:00

本帖最后由 wei 于 2010-4-29 06:06 编辑

I hope you are joking. It's such a nonsense. Next you will say burning someone's house is also a f ...
mh 发表于 2010-4-27 03:08 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

Agreed with mh's point.
However,Since I can't really tell how close these routes are to each other,personally I would try climbing Torsen's route before criticizing. And I don't see any problem of two climbs sharing anchor, After all, ethic is largely about preserving the natural/adventurous experience of climbing and the rock itself, In order to make a rather fair call, one has to actually be there, experience it, maybe it's a magnificent climb, and
it distance far enough from other climbs that you won't notice others when you are there. Before I had any bad experience, I would like to stay positive and appreciate the one who found the line.


Wei

jane 发表于 2010-4-30 09:12

I hope you are joking. It's such a nonsense. Next you will say burning someone's house is also a f ...
mh 发表于 2010-4-27 03:08 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

I was as serious as the news on The Onions.   Talking about burning, checking out the "Burning Man Festival" in the high desert.It is a festival set in the southwest desert every September.

mh 发表于 2010-4-30 15:29

oops. guess I am just too thick. but hey local news source such as sina.com do take articles from the Onion as real stories.

zhangxiaoliu23 发表于 2010-5-2 19:58

一条线引出这么多的争论,先不做评论,说说我听到的两个爬过这条线的人对线路本身的评价:bolt位置很远,bolt周围找不到能挂快挂的动作,很绝望,两位都是很有经验和能力的攀登者。不知道到这条线有人FA了没有?
下周争取到现场看看

紫笛依扬 发表于 2010-5-3 20:10

本帖最后由 紫笛依扬 于 2010-5-3 12:12 编辑

节前北京的龙少爬了http://www.alpiner.org/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=7149&extra=page%3D1

灰灰 发表于 2010-5-3 21:17

节前北京的龙少爬了
紫笛依扬 发表于 2010-5-3 12:10 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

紫笛看错了,龙少他们爬的是一号线、二号线,好像没爬新开的那条线。

andes 发表于 2010-5-3 23:45

本帖最后由 andes 于 2010-5-3 15:52 编辑

五一期间,我和小明一起攀登了纪念碑二号线。两段到顶下来后,使用顶绳攀登了新开的三号线。
抛开形而上的东西而言,作为在纪念碑一号线开线的人之一,我觉得:
1、三号线不影响一号和二号线,的确是一条有意义的路线。精彩之处在于第三把快挂位置的Slab和那个小岩脊的攀登。
2、在向上攀登过程中,保护站与一二号线不存在共用与拥挤问题。有三个独立的保护站,互不影响。虽然只有一个下降环,但是不会影响同时向上攀登。
3、三号线的保护点位置值得商榷。说白了,需要攀登者很高的投入度(commitment)和丰富的先锋攀登经验。在第三、四、五个保护点。尤其是第五个保护点,可能会导致冲坠受伤。在白河,在北京的攀岩氛围内,这不是一条适合新手或顶绳老手先锋攀登的路线。
4、关于难度。如果沿着第三、四个挂片的位置直线上升,难度应该不止为11D。如果向右偏离很多,则挂片的位置有很大的问题。
5、二号线的第一段10b左右。第二段,有想象力,但不止11a。快到顶时横移的部分有意思。然而横移部分下方的地方没有必要打手指洞。

nk 发表于 2010-5-4 09:26

:L,2号爬了,但爬的是2号线的第一段和1号线的第2段.
TOP试了3号线,2进3就折了,FACE面,手点小OPEN,压高脚平衡站起,很惆怅.
感觉线路确实不错,BOLT也确实够惊险,线路下边有棵松树,如果3进4冲了容易砸树上.顶绳没摸下来之前先锋确实需要胆气.
感谢小柳事先的提醒.

灰灰 发表于 2010-5-4 12:38

5、二号线的第一段10b左右。第二段,有想象力,但不止11a。快到顶时横移的部分有意思。然而横移部分下方的地方没有必要打手指洞。andes 发表于 2010-5-3 15:45 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif

二号线最早的定级难度:第一段5.9+,第二段5.11d。
后来阿甘给改了:Pitch1 / 29m / 5.9 ,Pitch2 / 18m / 5.10d ,另外高度好像也不对。
去年年底我又爬了一遍,感觉第一段5.10a,第二段5.11c/d。
不如大家折中一下确定,建议:第一段/27米/5.10a,第二段/21米/5.11c。
第一段双绳下降如果使用50米绳索,则绳索末端距地面距离约1米,下降到绳尾人正好站到地面上,注意绳尾必须打结。


然而横移部分下方的地方没有必要打手指洞。 http://bbs.rockbeer.org/images/common/back.gif
误会了!那个不是手指洞,是连轴转的坏BOLT(好像有两个),我把它给连根挖出来了,所以留下了近似三角形的孔,以后可以找些胶沙给补平了。
由于国产BOLT存在一些质量问题,所以发现有些路线的BOLT,都出现连轴转、拧不紧的问题,我打算发明一个构件,可以将坏BOLT拔出来(孔还可以换新钉),这样就不会有坏钉残留在岩壁上了。

andes 发表于 2010-5-4 23:04

回复 38# 灰灰

呵呵,明白了。

Torsten 发表于 2010-5-10 17:25

我觉得第三号线不危险。我算每个挂片的位置很小心。每个挂片可以挂从稳定的位置。如果攀得小心应该没事。保护的人一定要注意安全! 你只有要 “Balls“ 和能力才能过去。:P
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 纪念 Güllich